I found came across this earlier during the day and wanted to up load a link to the page, just in case any body is interested or has been affected by the identifiable practises which are underlined in the sub text or why this post is or could prove to be relevant if experiencing any forms of communities harassment or mobbing via subtle way of provocation by the use of group gaslighting and the use of dog whistle politics, if they suspect an illegal investigation has been conducted under the false assumption of fraud, or if they naturally assume that some of their paranoia/unusual beliefs maybe the result of something else, then please read and think about the tactics employed within recent historic events.
Thank you, and here is an extract
.The word is difficult to translate because it means originally biodegradation. But actually, it’s a quite accurate description. The goal was to destroy secretly the self-confidence of people, for example by damaging their reputation, by organizing failures in their work, and by destroying their personal relationships. Considering this, East Germany was a very modern dictatorship. The Stasi didn’t try to arrest every dissident. It preferred to paralyze them, and it could do so because it had access to so much personal information and to so many institutions.
East Germany's Stasi Surveillance: Tactics and Impact (wondriumdaily.com)
Welfare policy in the UK today: the government's flawed approach to fraud | Privacy International
Shedding light on the DWP Part 2 - A Long Day's Journey Towards Transparency | Privacy International
Thank you, and here is an extract
.The word is difficult to translate because it means originally biodegradation. But actually, it’s a quite accurate description. The goal was to destroy secretly the self-confidence of people, for example by damaging their reputation, by organizing failures in their work, and by destroying their personal relationships. Considering this, East Germany was a very modern dictatorship. The Stasi didn’t try to arrest every dissident. It preferred to paralyze them, and it could do so because it had access to so much personal information and to so many institutions.
East Germany's Stasi Surveillance: Tactics and Impact (wondriumdaily.com)
Welfare policy in the UK today: the government's flawed approach to fraud | Privacy International
Shedding light on the DWP Part 2 - A Long Day's Journey Towards Transparency | Privacy International
