Freedom of Thought is Fundamental

[Nous]

Would it be an act of resistance to willing oppose the toxic abuse of others by way of refusal, dismissal and act of inaction by the individual concerned as all statuary and commonly understood basic Human Rights enacting legislation working via this fundamental and pivotal commonly held principal, so would the broader scope now or in the subsequent future appropriately address this now biometric, individual, intellectual, data, content and contextual usage, health, and our political persuasions to who's accountability and safeguarding practices would we be held to account too.

So even to live co residing within two internal realities each resisting the other within my spectral awareness could count as an expression of freedom of autonomy of which would consist of my thoughts.

 

[Lee]

I think what you’re talking about could definitely be seen as an act of resistance. Refusing to engage with abuse, or actively choosing not to feed into it, can be a way of protecting your own autonomy — especially when it’s happening inside your own mind.

If we think about human rights in the broadest sense, they do cover things like freedom of thought and personal integrity. Whether the law will ever fully catch up to ideas like “internal realities” or “spectral awareness” is another matter, but the principle is still there: your mind is yours.

So yeah, choosing not to let one reality dominate the other could be its own form of freedom — even if that freedom only exists inside your own head.